Highest Quality Stocks Today

Stocks ranked by AIQ Quality sub-score — earnings durability, balance sheet integrity, and return on invested capital. Updated every market day.

Today's Market Pulse

Highest Quality Stocks: AcceleratingMarket closed

Average Quality rose +0.6 points to 86.8 since the prior session; 4 new names entered the list; Healthcare holds 32% of positions (balanced leadership).

Avg Quality

86.8+0.6

7D Quality change

+1

Signal breadth

0%0pt

New entrants

4

Concentration

32%0pt

Latest available ranking: 2026-06-10 — a newer session's update is delayed · 25 ranked stocks · 1,469 source symbols · Methodology v1.0

Today's Ranking

RankTickerSectorAIQQualityQualityResilienceRank Δ1dStateResearch
1KPTIHealthcare7010010016Consistent LeaderStock·Compare
2ACADHealthcare71999971Consistent LeaderStock·Compare
3DAVETechnology70979737Stock·Compare
4DUOLTechnology76969657Consistent LeaderStock·Compare
5QLYSTechnology71959544Consistent LeaderStock·Compare
6DECKConsumer Cyclical74949467Consistent LeaderStock·Compare
7ASMLTechnology65929248Stock·Compare
8NVOHealthcare64909039newStock·Compare
9INCYHealthcare76898970▼1Consistent LeaderStock·Compare
10CALMConsumer Defensive72898966▼1Consistent LeaderStock·Compare
11AMATTechnology66868644Strong Momentum / Elevated RiskStock·Compare
12JNJHealthcare67858554Stock·Compare
13PAYCTechnology66858550newStock·Compare
14PGRFinancial Services68848456newStock·Compare
15ANFConsumer Cyclical71838344▼2Stock·Compare
16PPGBasic Materials71828248▼2Stock·Compare
17MRKHealthcare67828246▼2Stock·Compare
18ALLFinancial Services70818150▼2Stock·Compare
19ADPIndustrials67818160▼2Stock·Compare
20ILMNHealthcare66818148Stock·Compare
21FASTIndustrials65818178▼2Stock·Compare
22GSKHealthcare64818151▼1Stock·Compare
23WSMConsumer Cyclical65808045▼1Strong Momentum / Elevated RiskStock·Compare
24PAYXIndustrials64808056newStock·Compare
25FFIVTechnology67787864▼2Stock·Compare

State labels appear only when a stock meets a defined condition (New Leader, Consistent Leader, Accelerating, Momentum Divergence, Losing Leadership, Strong Momentum / Elevated Risk). Most rows carry no label on most days — that is by design, so labels stay meaningful.

Entered since 2026-06-09

Today vs. 2026-06-03

Average Quality86.8+1 vs. last week
Leading sectorHealthcare32% of list
Risk directionstable

Sector distribution

Healthcare8 · 32%
Technology7 · 28%
Consumer Cyclical3 · 12%
Industrials3 · 12%
Financial Services2 · 8%
Basic Materials1 · 4%
Consumer Defensive1 · 4%

Risk Resilience distribution

Resilient · 70–100
3
Balanced · 50–69
11
Elevated risk · below 50
11
Unavailable
0

Risk Resilience is scored so higher values indicate stronger downside and volatility resilience.

Recent historical context

The last 10 available market snapshots, using the same selection methodology as today.

SessionStocksAverage Quality
2026-06-102586.8
2026-06-092586.2
2026-06-082586.8
2026-06-052586.7
2026-06-042586.5
2026-06-032585.8
2026-05-282587.4
2026-05-262585.4
2026-05-222586.6
2026-05-212587.4

Why these stocks rank highly

KPTIKPTI ranks #1 with a Quality score of 100. It has held a top-10 position in at least 8 of the last 10 sessions — sustained membership carries more signal than a single-day appearance.

ACADACAD ranks #2 with a Quality score of 99, newly on the list versus 2026-06-09. It has held a top-10 position in at least 8 of the last 10 sessions — sustained membership carries more signal than a single-day appearance.

DAVEDAVE ranks #3 with a Quality score of 97, newly on the list versus 2026-06-09.

DUOLDUOL ranks #4 with a Quality score of 96, newly on the list versus 2026-06-09. It has held a top-10 position in at least 8 of the last 10 sessions — sustained membership carries more signal than a single-day appearance.

QLYSQLYS ranks #5 with a Quality score of 95, newly on the list versus 2026-06-09. It has held a top-10 position in at least 8 of the last 10 sessions — sustained membership carries more signal than a single-day appearance.

Why this matters

Takeaway: Quality improved this week, but participation remains narrow.

0% of the ranked list improved its Quality score versus the prior snapshot (+0 points of breadth vs. the session before). Participation this narrow means the list's headline strength rests on fewer names — a fragility worth noting.

Leadership concentration is balanced: Healthcare accounts for 32% of the list (+0 points vs. the prior session). Sector exposure is balanced, though a further rise in the top sector's share would start to concentrate rotation risk.

What to watch next

1Not confirmed

Whether Quality breadth recovers above 50% (currently 0%) — continued sub-50% readings would confirm fading participation.

2Holding

Whether KPTI holds the #1 position — leaders that hold the top spot across multiple sessions carry more signal than single-day appearances.

3Not confirmed

Whether new entrants (NVO, PAYC, PGR) stay on the list — one-session appearances often reflect single-factor noise rather than durable signal change.

What "quality" means in this ranking

The AIQ Quality sub-score measures business durability: margin stability across cycles, earnings consistency, balance-sheet integrity, and return on invested capital. It deliberately excludes price behavior — a stock can rank at the top of this list while its price goes nowhere, because quality describes the business, not the trade. The list re-ranks daily as new fundamental and market data flows through the scoring pipeline.

Quality is one of the most persistent documented factor premiums: portfolios of high-profitability, low-leverage, stable-earnings companies have historically outperformed their junk counterparts on a risk-adjusted basis across decades and geographies. The premium is most visible in drawdowns — quality names typically fall less and recover faster, which is why quality allocations are often described as defense that doesn't require market timing.

How to use this list

Two productive patterns. First, as a hold-list filter: names here that also carry decent momentum are candidates for longer holding periods, because business durability supports trend durability. Second, as a drawdown shopping list: high-quality names that sell off with the market rather than on their own news are historically where post-correction recoveries concentrate. Cross-reference the Daily Market Regime — when the regime turns ELEVATED or HIGH RISK, this list typically becomes more valuable, not less.

FAQ

Why do some high-quality names have mediocre AIQ composite scores?

Because the composite blends four factors. A superb business trading at a stretched valuation with fading momentum can score 90+ on Quality and 55 on the composite. That is not a contradiction — it is the ranking telling you the business is excellent and the current entry point is not.

How different is this from a dividend or low-volatility list?

Quality overlaps both but equals neither: plenty of high-quality companies pay no dividend, and quality is measured from fundamentals rather than price variance. A low-volatility screen can be full of structurally mediocre businesses that simply trade quietly; this list cannot.

Go deeper

© 2026 AlgoVestIQTermsPrivacyRisk Disclosure

Informational only, not investment advice. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal.