In a Neutral regime, HAS's AIQ Score of 47/100 with Quality base of 30/100 and accelerating Momentum at 83/100 (Δ+48) signals mixed conviction. Wait for component alignment before adding exposure. Watch momentum trend for confirmation or fading.
Momentum (83/100) leads while Quality (30/100) lags. This cross-factor spread creates entry timing uncertainty. Wait for the lagging factor to begin recovering before adding aggressively.
Quick Stats
HAS's 7-day signal profile is improving with AIQ change of +11.0 points and momentum delta of +48.0. Trend delta is +11.00, which helps frame whether the current move is accelerating or fading.
Snapshot: Sun, 26 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT. Baseline: 2026-07-17.
| Date | AIQ | Mom | Val | Qual | Resilience |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-25 | 47 | 83 | 36 | 30 | 41 |
| 2026-07-18 | 36 | 35 | 36 | 30 | 49 |
| 2026-07-11 | 34 | 26 | 36 | 30 | 49 |
| 2026-07-04 | 35 | 30 | 36 | 30 | 50 |
| 2026-06-27 | 39 | 47 | 36 | 30 | 51 |
Premium Feature
Full AIQ Analysis
AIQ Intelligence
AI Analysis Report
Scenario Analysis
AIQ Scenario Builder
HAS (HAS) Stock Analysis
HAS (HAS) has an AIQ Score of 47/100 in a Neutral regime as of Jul 25, 2026. Momentum is strongest at 83/100. Quality is weakest at 30/100. The main conflict is that momentum leads at 83/100 while quality lags at 30/100.
HAS (HAS) carries an AIQ Score of 47 out of 100, placing it in a mixed signal regime for this snapshot. A mid-range reading typically means component signals are not fully aligned, so interpretation should focus on what is improving versus what is lagging.
Beta is 0.53, implying roughly 47% lower sensitivity than a broad market baseline.
In the latest weekly profile, AIQ has moved +11.0 points over the last 7 days, momentum delta is +48.0, trend delta is +11.00, risk delta is -8.0. This combination is most useful for judging whether signal quality is strengthening or fading into mean reversion.
| Evidence Layer | Public Evidence |
|---|---|
| Regime Context | HAS is in a Neutral AIQ regime with score 47/100. |
| Signal Conflict | The primary conflict is that momentum leads at 83/100 while quality lags at 30/100. |
| Factor Evidence | Momentum 83/100 · Value 36/100 · Quality 30/100 · Risk 41/100 |
| Persistence | HAS has scored AIQ 60+ in 0 of the last 60 daily snapshots. 30-day avg: 38/100. 60-day avg: 36/100. |
| Checklist | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Factor strength | Pass | Momentum is the strongest factor at 83/100. |
| Timing | Pass | Momentum is 83/100 with 7-day delta +48.0. |
| Regime fit | Wait | HAS is in a Neutral regime at 47/100. |
| Risk control | Wait | Risk factor is 41/100 with beta of 0.53 implies lower sensitivity than the broader market. |
| Conflict | Wait | Current conflict: momentum leads at 83/100 while quality lags at 30/100. |
HAS's 7-day signal profile is improving with AIQ change of +11.0 points and momentum delta of +48.0. Trend delta is +11.00, which helps frame whether the current move is accelerating or fading.
Signal snapshot as of Sun, 26 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT. 7-day comparison baseline: 2026-07-17.
| Metric | Current |
|---|---|
| AIQ Score | 47/100 |
| Price | $88.79 |
| Beta | 0.53 |
HAS vs Retail — Specialty & Discount Peers
Portfolio Implication
Related Links
HAS Stock FAQ
What does the HAS AIQ Score mean?
AIQ Score summarizes multiple factors for HAS, including momentum, value, quality, and risk. Higher scores generally indicate stronger combined signals, but you should still validate with your own risk tolerance.
How often is HAS data updated?
HAS quote and scoring components refresh on the platform cadence. Always confirm timestamp freshness on-page before making time-sensitive decisions.
Should I compare HAS with an index before investing?
Yes. Comparing HAS versus benchmarks like SPY or QQQ helps you separate stock-specific strength from broader market moves.
Where can I review deeper HAS fundamentals, technicals, and risk?
Use the Fundamentals, Technicals, and Risk tabs from this page to inspect driver-level metrics behind the headline score.
How the AIQ Score Is Built
Methodology, factor weights, and how to interpret score history
Loading HAS...