AIQ Laggards
Lowest ranked today
| Rank ▲ | Ticker | Sector | AIQ | Smart | Quality | Risk | Momentum | Value | Δ7d | Mom Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Consumer Cyclical | 26 /100 | 1 /10 | 18 /100 | 23 /100 | — /100 | 35 /100 | — | — | |
| 2 | Consumer Cyclical | 28 /100 | 1 /10 | 12 /100 | 44 /100 | 25 /100 | 39 /100 | -1 | -2 | |
| 3 | Industrials | 28 /100 | 1 /10 | 0 /100 | 21 /100 | 59 /100 | 34 /100 | +7 | +27 | |
| 4 | Energy | 31 /100 | 1 /10 | 1 /100 | 33 /100 | 24 /100 | 65 /100 | -3 | -14 | |
| 5 | Consumer Cyclical | 32 /100 | 1 /10 | 27 /100 | 38 /100 | 24 /100 | 40 /100 | — | -1 | |
| 6 | Consumer Cyclical | 32 /100 | 1 /10 | 30 /100 | 25 /100 | 48 /100 | 24 /100 | -5 | -20 | |
| 7 | Consumer Defensive | 32 /100 | 1 /10 | 47 /100 | 41 /100 | 19 /100 | 24 /100 | -8 | -29 | |
| 8 | Financial Services | 33 /100 | 1 /10 | 0 /100 | 27 /100 | 75 /100 | 34 /100 | +1 | +6 | |
| 9 | Technology | 33 /100 | 1 /10 | 30 /100 | 24 /100 | 42 /100 | 34 /100 | +5 | +20 | |
| 10 | Technology | 34 /100 | 1 /10 | 12 /100 | 31 /100 | 64 /100 | 34 /100 | +3 | +14 | |
| 11 | Financial Services | 34 /100 | 1 /10 | 32 /100 | 33 /100 | 50 /100 | 24 /100 | +5 | +25 | |
| 12 | Communication Services | 34 /100 | 1 /10 | 41 /100 | 38 /100 | 33 /100 | 25 /100 | -4 | -17 | |
| 13 | Consumer Defensive | 35 /100 | 1 /10 | 31 /100 | 47 /100 | 40 /100 | 29 /100 | -3 | -11 | |
| 14 | Consumer Defensive | 35 /100 | 1 /10 | 23 /100 | 46 /100 | 35 /100 | 42 /100 | -4 | -16 | |
| 15 | Technology | 35 /100 | 1 /10 | 39 /100 | 40 /100 | 30 /100 | 34 /100 | +2 | +11 |
Sector concentration
Distribution of sectors in this snapshot.
AIQ Laggards: Understanding Systematic Weakness
The AIQ Laggards leaderboard surfaces the lowest-ranked stocks in the tracked universe -- those where the composite signal across Quality, Momentum, Value, and Risk is most unfavorable. This list is not a short-sell screen, though it can inform the risk management side of long portfolios. Its primary value is identifying where the systematic evidence is most bearish, which is useful both for avoiding new positions and for monitoring existing holdings that may be deteriorating.
Stocks appearing repeatedly on the Laggards list are experiencing persistent systematic weakness across multiple factor dimensions. This is a different and more concerning signal than a stock that appears on Laggards briefly due to a price-driven momentum decline: persistent multi-factor weakness often reflects fundamental deterioration (earnings quality declining, balance sheet stress building, competitive position eroding) rather than transient technical dislocation.
For existing portfolio holders, the Laggards list serves as a risk management prompt. If a stock you own appears here, the appropriate response is not automatic selling -- context matters, and the stock may be genuinely oversold with a mean-reversion thesis. The appropriate response is a systematic re-examination of the investment thesis with fresh eyes, specifically asking whether the factor deterioration the model is detecting reflects something about the business you should update your view on.
How to Read This Table
- Stocks with AIQ Score below 30 are in the range where systematic bearishness is material -- multiple factors are unfavorable simultaneously.
- Low Risk sub-score (high realized risk) combined with low AIQ is the most concerning combination -- elevated volatility and poor fundamental signals together.
- Check Quality sub-score specifically: a stock with low Momentum but high Quality may be an oversold fundamental opportunity; low Quality alongside low Momentum is a more dangerous position.
AIQ scores update daily based on observable market and fundamental data. Scores are systematic signals, not investment recommendations. Past score levels do not guarantee future price performance.